>>4197723>And you use just one and take 3 shots while moving it around a little, I know.Or select the intended point, or on some models let the DSLR track. Some of the last generation of DSLRs had rudimentary object and face tracking via metering sensors which were low rez imaging sensors.
At any rate, how does this support your claim that 5yo DSLRs belong in a studio?
>Bro what micro four turds or 2012 sony shit were you usingEven the latest/best EVFs still have color balance and DR issues. Lag/smearing is finally a solved problem, but only at the top end.
>>but it isn't really any better at common ISOs. So an R6 or A7s III can effectively shoot at higher ISOs than a 5D4 or 6D, but noise isn't really better at something like ISO 3200 or 6400.>Haha nopicrel and at ISO 25,600.
>It depends on the camera. The A7IV in particular has such fat chroma noise that fixing it loses some detail.Not sure what software you're using, but in ACR even 100 color NR does not affect detail. It does affect color fidelity and colors can get wonky with excessive color NR.