>>3957397>be a rangefinder hipsterCompact, but expensive because of the demand. I'm not terribly interested in street photography. Maybe use them for travel, there's something nostalgic about getting holiday snaps on film like when I was a kid.
>get a half frame cameraEven more compact, low cost per frame for the same use as the above. Worst image quality of the bunch, but when shooting film in this day and age maybe grain is what you actually want.
>get a 90s 35mm SLRConvenient with automation. Can use modern lenses that can be shared with modern cameras. But usually quite bulky. Feels a lot like shooting a DSLR, which is a bit pointless.
>get a 70s 35mm SLRStill quite cheap. Lighter and more compact than later SLRs.
>just buy a film sim preset pack and stick to digitalCheapest and easiest option. I'm no more a grain peeper than a pixel peeper, so I don't care if pros can tell the difference. But it misses out on the whole tactile feeling of the process.
