>>2641096>Actually, maybe a 50mm f/1.2L for starters? It's not even that big or heavy in absolute terms.That's a starter? What's the intermediate one? I want to get the higher ones so I wont need to upgrade in the future. I think it's going to be cheaper that way in the long run.
>Look into that first. A set of fairly powerful Yongnuo / Neewer / Cactus speedlights or panel lights - or even Canon / Metz ones - are going to be cheaper and in many instances more effective than a high-end lens will be.I have a Canon Speedlite 320EX which can be operated wirelessly with a Yongnuo Digital RF-603C Fsk 2.4ghz add on. is that goos enough or should I buy another one?
> The tripod I own is the portable one that's designed to be put on top or rocks and other higher terrain so it's quite short.In that case I think I will invest on a full sized one then. The one I currently have is the bendable kind which is less than a foot tall.
