>>3737656they are supposed to be like that, im a sucker for early '90s titty mag aesthetic that i try to emulate (without the huge hair and diffusion). Ironically i find the erotic, sexy "you really can’t see anything" photos kinda boring, i've seen them a milion times. straight up porn pics also, for me at least, lack that extra step- why go to the forest if we can just shoot tits here and now.
i'm fully aware that these pics are anything but creative, i just really, really like this aesthetic. naked chicks in a forest are just my thing i guess. today i'm gonna get slides developed that have more... taste. also i did two rolls of fp4 but i think that lack of color will be a detriment.
>>3737686as above, they are supposed to be like that, unapologetically in your face tits. i really dont care about digital, thats a lr preset that i downloaded few years ago, slapped it on and exported jpgs.
>>3737617>>3737619>>3737640to all of you, i feel really flattered that it seems that im the only one on /p/ that can get girls naked for free, and you incel seething starts to feel like a compliment to my social skills. thank you!