>>2989749>marching over and starting the conversation with "did you just take a picture of me" or "delete that picture"This.
>>2989760>I just don't see myself wanting to have a picture of someone who clearly objected to having that picture takenYou douchebags keep implying I actively shoot people who express a desire not to be shot. This is bullshit. Usually I'm fast, so it's not until afterwards that they express anyhting different to what made me find them photogenic in the first place.
More often they get their mind poisoned muuuuch later by you douchebag bullshit spinning haters, and then generally demand I delete a shot in a way that requires me to look through 94,000 images to find them (a screensot of a shot i took years ago, where they aren't even the main subject). The fact that they are wrong about whatever neurotic bullshit they have invented in thier mind to rationalise deleting the photo, and that they demand it, AND that I have had assholes demanding I delete photos they are clearly not the subject of (because I know the subject), means I ignore *almost* all removal demands after the photo is uploaded.
If I see you express 'no' before I take the shot, I never take the shot. But it can be very difficult to tell. People who are neurotic enough to respond negatively to cameras usually look exactly like people who are just being coy and will give a huge smile a few seconds later.
Haters never understand this. They don't want to.
>>2989802>got <3 bannedThat's a new one.
Last eggymyth I heard was that I was a retired porn star. (big, ugly, shaved head)
Also, fuck you, cunt.
