>>4028402It's called business expenses. Dont pay any attention to what pros use. These guys make good money. All that shit is just a tax sink they claim back on their tax return. Pic related
>>4028403I dont know what he's using, but you can still get A7RII new around $1.8k. If you cant find one, A7RIII or Z7II comes on sale for 2500 bucks every now and then. All those are 42MP.
Sigma 100-400mm for sony is $900 bucks. It's $100 less for the Nikon but it's only for F mount so works out more expensive with the adapter. Dont know how the autofocus would work with Nikons dogshit ftz crap but it is what it is. Sub-$3k total setup either way. That's less than what you said it costs for a 50MP body. I know its 42MP, but its close enough. When you crop in, that's 21MP effective resolution at 800mm equivalent at max focal length. Thats enough pixels for the micro four guys.
