Quoted By:
The only interesting thing is the large mount, which however makes it uninteresting as well.
I want mirrorless for its small formfactor. Large mounts equals large lenses (at least diameter).
They also need to proof their claims of better edge sharpness first to convince me of the mounts superiority.
Fast aperture lenses are possible even on smaller mounts but whats the use of it? Even 1.4 can be pretty unpractical when shooting close and lenses even faster, especially 0.95, cost thousands of dollar.
Only one card slot is a dealbreaker for me. Doing a shoot without a backup card. Seriously?
I waited for Nikon's release but now im pretty certain to go with a Sony a7Riii.
From what i can tell so far:
Smaller body, I can use their aps-c lenses like the 16-50 if i need a very, very compact zoom, eye-af(!), better battery, allready larger lens collection, can also adapt a very wide range of non native lenses, a system in its third generation the main problems sorted out by now, (better body and lens aesthetics)
