>>3440732Yeah, I am not too worried about the technical aspects of my photography at this point, more just looking for people to judge the strength of the images which you have done very well. Thanks for your comments, getting other people's opinions is really important to me so I can better represent my work and make sure I am not favoring images that I personally like over ones that are more generally appealing.
>>3440794Thanks for your comments. I do agree that the first image is probably the most visually striking of this set. I am planning to do exactly what you suggested by combing through my work for the best shots this year.
>>3440858So on the two you said were dumb but you like, I am currently working on a series where I present monumental buildings that are obscured or framed by other less monumental structures. Some work better than others but I actually really like most of what I have been able to come up with. I agree though that it is not something conventionally appealing. Here's another from that series from a while ago.
