>>4394362There nothing new under the sun.
Everything is has already been said before. The only thing that matters in art is HOW YOU SAY IT, period. If there's nothing to your form then you're not an artist, just a soulless journalist. There is a way how an artist deals with a subject. I know a Solomon D. Butcher's photograph when I see it, nobody has to tell it to me. This is what I mean by form. Now this isn't true AT ALL for sterile and political bullshit which plagues all of photojournalism.
Of course I am egoistic about my artistic opinions. We artists play God after all. What I am saying is that most grants are aimed at """social issues""" and I get the impression that photography isn't "serious enough" for them so they have to put on the big boy pants and pretend that what they're doing is primary to the survival of the """community""" they're documenting. They're filled with activist larpers NOT artists.
>with no respect for anyoneYou don't know me. I have been shat on countless times. I don't even know where is the gate of "art market". I feel inadequate, disposable and left out. This is why I am salty.
>Grow up, then try again.What does this even mean?
