>>4275944>Would you get a linhof technorama?I didn't even know this existed, but it looks amazing
but the truth is: I would love to be gifted one of those, or at most find it for a super low price
because that would be a shitload of money to buy a camera I would certainly not use it enough to justify the astronomically high price
I'm not a camera collector, I'm a camera user
So if I got one, I would love to shoot with it and I'd use if often for sure, and find new ways to do some weird stuff with it
But if I had that much money lying around, I'd probably get something I would use more often
I started messing with panoramas because I made a cheap adaptation and it's fun to shoot with it
But for true panoramas I'm experimenting for the first time now with a 35mm film on a 6x7
>see picrelDidn't work out too well, it seems that the lab who removed the remjet fucked up the emulsion (it's like a local lab's version of Cinestill – a Kodak Vision 3 500T with the remjet removed)
The colours are completely off, too (this is the best I could do with the scans I got)
Still I kinda like it
120 film panoramas would be a dream, though
