>>3276280Yeah National Geographic is famous for grey looking flat images. All the best film stocks looked like a grey mess with green yellow tint.
You are proof that you can nail focus, exposure, and composition, but still be a bad photographer. What’s worse than that is that your response to criticism is to claim your garbage editing looks like reality when it’s just an artifact of digital editing, flat raw sensor output, that trash shit for brains think is normal, just like how Isi thinks shooting at 25600 iso and flash gels is novel when it’s just a mess of noise and color vomit.
Great attitude to bring to the game, anything but the flat raw output is a meme. I thought Isi was bad.