>>3976478I'm failing to understand what you're even talking about when you're talking about composition. All the photos in question are composed properly. Panorama is just raw output that still needs to be cut.
This poster offered one solution,
>>3976418. You could go for complete abstraction, or something like this.
What you can't do when you're taking a panorama, is compose is perfectly on the scene. You don't have a full view in viewfinder, you can't see where the frame ending are. It's all done by sight only, and when doing panoramas with very wide field of view, you can't even see the complete scene with eyes only. It's like doing fisheye photography without seeing fish eye results in the viewfinder. It's what's making them more challenging than people understand.
