>>2864905>>2864908>>2864909somebody is overly upset for no real reason
you don't have to like my stuff. you can be as critical as you want. I don't receive much criticism because music photography is very asspatting.
sure, you can criticize my usual response as well. I sent the photos of third eye blind to their manager and she said they're open to discussing me touring on a later date since their tour is about to finish.
you do realize "advice" does not translate to a rulebook? we're here to discuss photography and I don't think anyone is going to personally be offended when I suggest they lower their shutter or narrow their aperture. as I said, we're here to discuss things.
don't even get into the love and emotion of concert photography lol. you cannot expect every photo posted to showcase shit, especially when I'm not at the show FOR the band and the band is not performing a context in which I have any control over that. you're a fucking clown for even bringing up concert photography from the 70s.
I briefly ran into danny clinch over the weekend and let me tell you, you do not know shit about concert photography and how it works on a larger scale.
>>2864910: )
