>>3397848> no, [the 5D Mark III is a] 14 bit cameraYou're right, of course. Typo on my part (well, not exactly typo; I was throwing 12s and 14s and 16s around a lot and typed the wrong one). Sorry about that.
>>3397608>Prove you have a FF body from Sony, Canon, and Nikon>With a timestamp>With "dingleberry" written on it>With "curmudgeonly" written on it>With an A6000 in frame as wellFor my next trick, maybe I'll post pictures from all of them with the exif stripped and see if you can tell which one is which purely based on color science.
> You still haven't touched on what's wrong with the sony? 1. Autofocus is a bitch. To change your active focus point, you have to redefine a button to be your "Choose a focus point" button, tap that button, then tap another button for no reason I've been able to figure out yet, then you can change your active focus point.
2. Menus are a confusing morass. Unlike Canon and Nikon, there's no custom menu where you can stick frequently-changed settings.
3. You can't set a minimum shutter speed in aperture-priority auto-iso. If you want to have a minimum shutter speed, you have to switch to M mode, at which point it can't go over that speed if the light gets brighter.
4. Only two custom modes on the mode dial compared to 3 on my Canon. I use custom modes a lot, and I usually use all three. I haven't used the Sony in sufficiently-challenging scenarios to actually use them yet, really, but I played around with it a little bit and found it confusing.
5. The control wheels are deliberately placed to be difficult to use because the first-gen A7 got a lot of complaints about the control wheels being changed accidentally
6. The EVF/LCD eye sensor is too sensitive, meaning that if I try to shoot at waist level, most of the time it sees my big fat gut and thinks that's my face against the viewfinder even when it's several inches away. I think I've fixed this problem with a bit of carefully-placed tape, though.
