>>4365068do you know what scanner the lab used? maybe i just got a shitty one. Its a plustek 8100 and i thought it was supposed to be good
>>4365151>>4365153when you figure 4-5 mins per scan (7200dpi + ME, plus post editing) x 36 it really is an all day affair. If i had a better dslr I'd shoot the negatives but alas