>>3338497Almost certain it's not something on my end unless something utterly bizarre is going on. I used three lenses on that day - one with an integrated hood, and everything is like that.
Even different shots under evening light are different.
Am curious as to how the fucked it up this badly - but then again, I only asked for 'standard' resolution scans. Most labscans I've gotten have been 1.odd Megabytes, but these are in kilobytes.
Took a crop of this image and it seems to suggest there's detail on the physical slide, it's just been eaten by the scanner.
On thje one hand, it's dissapointing. On the other - it seems the actual slides proper are OK, although some are under exposed in the foreground,
