>>3909532I'll cap out with this before I go to bed just to make sure that we're clear. I'm not saying there is NO difference. I am saying that the difference is pretty trivial, especially when factoring the size and cost of it.
See moar from Petapixel. Though again, I'm sure there might be methodological issues that you'll whinge about. I mean, they aren't uploading the sweet delicious RAWs, so maybe MF images do look 'completely different' when blown up to billboard size. I dunno. I don't do that sorta photography. I'm just a hobbyist after all.
The difference between FF and DX is what? ~2x? See the attached. I don't see any quantum leap 'aesthetically' (fucking lol). I'll quote my original post before you sperged out:
>"Should I lug a MF on the scummy streets of Thailand?....'good enough is...good enough.>"I personally can BARELY see the 'aesthetic differences' between formats...I'm not even saying there is no difference...any difference is miniscule and not worth the size adn weight benefits I get shooting smaller cameras. >"HUR DUR THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A PHONE CAMERA AND A LARGE FORMAT CAMERA HUR DUR". Wait I didn't say that, you just put those words in my mouth. If your advanced aesthetic eye can pick apart the slight differences in tonality then kudos to you! If you feel that is worth spending thousands extra because it makes you look cool to the 'models you pull off the street' that's awesome man. I hope you get laid because of your sweet medium format camera bro.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8Sej2TEes4 (plz watch)
https://www.dpreview.com/opinion/2341704755/thinking-about-buying-medium-format-read-this-firsthttps://petapixel.com/2020/01/09/stop-romanticizing-medium-format-theres-nothing-magical-about-it/ 