>>3416236The other anon (
>>3416234) is right.
Unless you got a tripod and an 80A filter, indoors shots will look like crap colour wise. B&W is much better when the colour quality of the scene is crappy (like artificial tungsten light).
>picrelatedSometimes you can correct (up to an extent), but don't expect much cause negatives' underexposure latitude is minimal and you'd be trying to push the blue channel 2 stops.
>a mid 90s SLR, is it fine to rely on it? Or will it fuck me over? Every lightmeter after the '60's is perfectly fine. The lightmeter in any SLR after the '80's, let alone '90's, is as good as it gets and very close to the meters in modern dSLRs. Learn how the metering modes work, and trust it without hesitation.
