>>3811549Anon I don't disagree the DoF and FoV equivalence helps to give you an idea when you're starting on a new format. But within a short time of actually using it, you know which lens does what without having to mentally translate to 35mm terms.
This whole thing is a digicυck dick measuring contest between full frame and crop, just to "own" the other side by showing their system can do something that the other system can't.
Not a single photo has *ever* beein ruined by not having that *exact* amount of DoF and having 1 stop more or less instead.
Yet 99% of equivalence shitposting is about full frame, aps-c and mft.
This shows how irrelevant it is on film. There is like a single half frame interchangeable lens camera (Pen) (and one Konica) and a single 110 interchangeable lens camera (Pentax) that were half relevant.
It doesn't justify all the equivalence bickering about full frame and crop. Incessant, loud whinging and bitching with no relevance whatsoever to film.