>>4182595This isn't a /p/ discussion and there is no debate here. You were simply wrong and I corrected you. The normal response would be "ok, thanks faggot".
I know the origins of the word and what it means. This is completely irrelevant anyway because we were talking about non-human animals and like I said, they have a variety of sexes not a "genders". All scientific literature states this. Just stand corrected and move on. Also focus in the future please, you're completely off the rails.
https://nautil.us/no-animals-do-not-have-genders-237938/#:~:text=There%20is%20no%20control%20group,emerge%20from%20innate%20biological%20differences.
