>>2876521Isn't the a6000 like 600 bucks less than the a6300.
I never got why.
Or is it because the a6000 is older?
I never get the naming schemes of the companies. Panasonic just goes up in number with generations, that's simple, Canon adds a Mk. but the numbers and letters are all over the place, sony sometimes adds a roman numeral and sometimes not.
WTF?
Just stick with letters for the type of camera and numbers for the generation.
Also, what's a decent filter I need for videos? ND or Pol? And what's a good cheap source for them? they cost insanely much new.
