>>2950669I got to ask how the fuck you did that?
>>2950675I honestly tried it because someone said it was good for landscaping and the like. Should have stuck with Fuji - I always liked what Fuji did.
Blue on overexposure might explain it. The Hi-Matic does tend to overexpose a little in daylight, but not in a controlled sort of way.
>>2950733Not going back there again. Other prints came out scratched and dirty. The place I used to use - which was just an ordinary chemist, used to give out beautiful clean, crisp prints. This dedicated photography shop blew it first chance it got.
There's a place that came recommended, but desu I'd be embarrassed to go to a proper photography place. I amn't even at that sort of level.
On saying that I picked up a Spotmatic while I was over there that's halfway through a roll of film. Using an app on the phone to meter to see if this 50 year old thing even works .
