>>3217848Less glare would be good OR you can to try something more risky but possibly more rewarding by playing with the lighting to produce some dark and harsh shadows on the right side of the face. The lighting would have to be such where at least a 3rd of your face would be in shadow and there would be some light reflecting off the glasses (noticeable rim light on frames, maybe lense) That would look epic.
>>3217865Would be 11/10 without the blur.
>>3218164FUUUUCK. So much potential on this one with the right editing.
Bump the exposure, bump contrast, blacken those blacks, increase that rim light just a tad, add a minor tint (blues maybe orange). Crop is on point.
>>3218177This is the stuff that belongs on magazines and publications.
>>3218227I don't know why but I hate this one. Seems so fucken forced and cringy. Soz.
>>3218430Noice.
>>3218642It works. The harsh lights and reddish/orange foreground and blue background are a nice complement. The foreground blur really draws attention to the subject. The fruit bowl and basket are kind of distracting. Having the picture being taken head on (instead of on a tilt/angle) would be a +1
