>>3757116>it's a cool ideaTaking pictures of people and animals posed together isn't novel, how retarded can somebody be
>For Anastasiya Dobrovolskaya it's this one. Although I'm not a fan of that background, the contrast with the albino raven is striking and the picture as a whole just magical.The background is good there, lmao. You're so visually illiterate, dude.
The CoNtRaSt between the birds is on the nose and played out. So is the red dress. This looks like tumblr aesthetic trash. How old are you?
>kek, I could care less about Weiner. Put an actor in his place and it's still a great pic.It's literally not. Have you ever looked at a single good street photo? Every other streetfag on a subway has taken a better picture than that. Pic related.
>The pole isn't taking any interest hotspot and is out of focus. The coming out of the car thing is dumb and you'd know I didn't bring that up if you looked at how I shopped it out: >>3756938I'm glad you're verifying you're the same retard the other guy was arguing with earlier by calling it a "hotspot" again.
That's not what that word means. A hotspot is an overexposed area.
