>>4100674>The older models are basically on par with the 23mm f2That's good, or bad? I have an X100 currently, but it's first gen. No complaints about quality, but I thought those 23mm f/2 and 35 f/2 are far better than any X100 that isn't V. If image quality (with either of two lenses I've mentioned) is not drastically better between those two, I might just go for X100F, improvement in AF will be massive for me regardless of whether I'll end up with x-trans 3 or 4 and this logic of single package of x100 series is somewhat appealing to me.
