>>2972645>Thats moronic reasoning, but carry on...Takes one to know one
>Italian realism starting at £14000... [I'm ellipting the rest of the quote but commenting on it in its entirety]That's so total utter janitor tier how can you even try to defend yourself like that with a straight face. Commercial gallerists get to be in charge of what overhyped object the next rich buyer hangs on his wall or more likely dumps in a storage vault. Maybe you'd prefer the term "purveyor" or "peddler"... just for a second compare what you do to what curators who work in public venues programming shows for people to see and engage with do. If you don't write catalogue essays, or can't write a catalogue essay without falling back on inoperative (AKA meaningless) jargon, or bullshit failed tropes so hackneyed that they make it fundamentally impossible to distinguish between sincerity and cynicism in your text (tropes which by the way include whatever reheated version of historicism, modernism, and/or aesthetic formalism etc. etc. that they taught you to think with in school, assuming you weren't just educated in business), then you aren't a curator.
>Nope, in fact we rarely did...That doesn't strengthen the claim that what you are doing at work is, in fact, curating (which clearly i believe involves a creative labour of thought beyond things like market analysis and speculation)
>*Literal snigger* yeah okay...*Unzips katana* yeah okay say that to my face not online and see what happens
>Aww sweety, you think...Your first error was thinking that that was what I think. *Teleports behind you* Your second error was crossing me *cuts you down with senfukitatsumaki hissatsuwaza killer move* Also begging the question with equivocal self-suiting interpretations, which I do too but I'm a bit more graceful about it at least
