>>3663561>>3663579I didn't say the 50r's image quality wasn't superior. My point was simply that it wasn't *so* much superior as to justify the downsides like expensive-ass lenses, worse low-light performance because the expensive-ass lenses are also slow, shitty autofocus, 3fps shooting speed, etc.
Like, yeah, you can see the extremely subtle pattern on the jack a little better with the Fuji when you're looking at them side by side at 100%. If you made 16x20s from both and looked at them side by side, you wouldn't be able to see a difference. Maaaaybe if you pulled out a loupe, but certainly not at normal viewing distance.
And, of course, 99% of photos nowadays are never viewed outside of a less-than-screen-resolution version that's been Facebook-compressed, so no one's really going to notice the difference between a GFX and something like an old 12MP D700, much less a modern high-end full frame.
Like, pic related is the GFX vs the full frame camera I personally actually use. Clearly the Fuji trounces it in image quality. Would I trade my 5D3 for a GFX50?
... yes, of course I would, my dick gets real hard for medium format, but I'd immediately buy myself another used 5D3 to continue using as my main camera because it just works much, much better for the things I shoot.
