Quoted By:
>leave in 2018
>2024, decide to check on /p/ see whats up nowadays
>click on the link and open /p/
>'''''3D POP IS NOT REAL''''
holy shit.....
both 3d pop nerds and conspiracy theorists who deny it, need to learn how glass elements interact with light inside the lens once and for all... come on...
both sides are such uneducated pigs, its not even funny. even if rage baiting, its not even funny anymore, its just sad
this pointless arguing been going on since late 2000's aka. ever since majority of american gen pop got their hands on ILCs, with half of them making up retarded terms such as ''3d pop'' and ''micro contrast'' and making up their own ''scientific'' terms, all to explain what are basically freshman college physics, all while europeans and asians are trying to explain to them that they are retarded and need to read a book.
the fact that someone would rather spend 15 years of their life arguing about the same shit over and over again, just because... just to argue, instead of picking up a book or two and spend a week or two to learn what the fuck youre actually talking about and to realize how dumb you actually sound, that shit is insane to me. do you people really have no life outside of internet? hell, even if you dont, literally every university book ever made on every subject in existence, is nowadays available online to read either legally or illegally... and you still choose to be stupid. thats shits insane to me.
a single, tiny 0.1mm glass element can completely change the look of an image. it can change the color tone of the image, shapes, add/cut reflections, change shading, change color gradient levels and even add effects such as halos, stars or kaleidoscope effect... and yet you wild pigs are over here arguing whether or not a whole ass lens can produce a more realistic image than the other... hahahahaha so sad
just FYI, you guys look like a couple of 6 year olds trying to argue about organic spectroscopy or quantum physics
>pic not related
