>>4406437yeah sorry this camera is ass. worse than snoy. terrible color science from using the wrong raw converter - no one could be assed to fix this. there is nothing distinguishing it from modern full frame besides... being worse. we're all familiar with sensor size arguments but when the technology gap is this large it's all irrelevant. for a larger sensor to be better it also has to be in the same technological ballpark and so do the lenses.
the "mf look" only applies to film because it's just film (no bayer, extremely limited gamut) with better detail resolution and more grain at typical enlargement sizes, and a lot of the time, old film cameras were stuck with a subtle tilt-shift look from poor alignment and poor film flatness.
you would probably be a better photographer if you did dump all this shit and buy something newer. you only need a z7ii or a canon r5, but since you're a gearfag you could buy a 907x+cfv100c and a 35/85 ish equivalent pair and still do better just because it's still supported and you'd possibly take it off the farm (assuming you ever leave the farm)
