Or you could do it the other way round and shoot at daytime and turn it night :->
>>4143646>>4143655With sensors that are not iso-invariant, so for Canon all except for the most recent, you want to set the ISO high enough that ideally you won't have to push images in post.
I've also looked it up, regarding banding control for Canon bodies, the original 6D apparently was one of the first bodies that improved on this. In this respect it is better than the 5D3, but then it was released after that, even if only a little.
>>4143555>I like APS-CNothing wrong with that, Nothing wrong with that, I liked it too when my system was geared towards it. Switching was hard for me, and I definitely had a time when I wondered why. I guess I have a wider choice of lenses now, which is why full frame makes sense at least for Canon as far as I'm concerned. The Sigma 18-35mm f1.8 was introduced when I started making the switch, and I was eyeing it, but never bought it.
I hate that in tech-heavy threads people always try to push their own choices onto others. It won't change a thing but lead starters to follow something apparently greater instead of making their own decisions.
>>4143591I feel sorry for you. But now that you have gear that you're not happy with, put it to use or just switch. Gear mostly is a non-decision. Focus on having joy and do what it can. It's plenty. Way worse cameras would be plenty for most of the stuff.
