>>4391939>So what is your actual reason for not wanting the Sony?Canon leads because I'm already in the system (spare batteries, app, flashes, accustomed to the ergonomics and menus, and so forth), so Sony would be a complete shift + I'd have to sell all that stuff (same goes for Nikon).
>It has the best battery life, which you said is important.Battery life is the same as the R6mkII.
>highest resolution EVF Actually the lowest among the choices in OP, just by a tiny amount.
>significantly higher resolution, good for digitising filmRegarding digitization, my current workhorse is more than enough (30.1MP) for 135 film and the Sony (33MP) is only a mild upgrade. Sure it's better for 120 but if I was going to be upgrading for that reason alone I'd want >36MP to get more out of those negatives.
