>>4368392i also own one
>>4359415 and agree with it being a really solid well built feeling little thing. it certainly feels like a quality product, and some of the images i've gotten show the lens is great (gimped by the format unfortunately). But it just seems like a camera for no one when you really look at what it is. i guess pentax largely factored in the economy of film into deciding to make this thing because it would be frustrating to use for anyone wanting a more manual, capable camera, and it seems almost like it's too complex for the braindead zoomer market it feels like they thought they were aiming for. i just don't really get it. i feel like i like mine, but it puzzles me.
