>>43137313d pop does not exist. It's a nebulous term that basically means "i personally like this photo" or "i like photos taken with this gear". All attempts to quantify it have overlapped 100% with some easily measurable gear metric that the viewer enjoys because they actually have no clue what they're talking about
>>4313735Exhibit A
The dogfucker doesn't fail horrendously for the first time in his life at taking a photo so he thinks it has "3d pop".
But it's just babbys first rule of thirds snapshit with some vignetting and a slightly blurry background. Maybe one day, he will stop snapshitting his child/woman replacement, and become a real photographer. Shortly after that he will stop saying and thinking "3d pop" because he will finally know what he's doing.
Maybe.
