>>4128581>EXCUSE ME BUT THIS OTHER REVIEW PUT THE PRIMES MARGINALLY HIGHER AT SOME APERTURES AND IN SOME PARTS OF THE FRAME >:( The zoom might be better at further distances and the primes at closer, or vice versa, we are not proferred that information.
Did you miss this bit too
>the decency level we set about 39-41 lpmm and the best fixed focal lenses have been able to exceed slightly 80 lpmm>our list of record-breakers the Voigtlander Apo Lanthar 50 mm f/2 E (81.0 lpmm) and the Sigma C 65 mm f/2 DG DN (82.7 lpmm)>Sony is the best at longer focal lengths – at 135 mm it exceeds a very high level of 80 lpmm... an outstanding lens, providing you a sensational image quality at every focal length and across the framelmao.
>BUT IF I PUT THE SUN IN THE CORNER OF THE IMAGE AT THE RIGHT TIME OF DAY I GET SOEM FLARES AND GHOSTING >:(Is the flare and ghosting a problem in pic related, or do you not see how it could be used effectively? You need such careful positioning to trigger flares you either move 1 degree or wait 10 minutes. who's shooting into the sun with it in the corner of the frame without WANTING ghosting/flares? retards, that's who.
You're just mad that you got memed into buying a bokeh whore prime that you need to change over every 5 minutes, real pros always use the 70-200 so they don't miss shots.
Do you see a 135 or 65 on this list?
https://fstoppers.com/originals/five-lenses-every-portrait-photographer-should-have-489491 no? guess why.
