>>3518125We agree to a large extent.
>(what's the subject? the fence? nothing grabs the eye)The fence is only there to have foreground, I also used it to cover headlights. The motivation was the dawn.
>[The leading lines] just sort of end.Ending or interrupted lines are a non issue. We agree on the other points.
>You could have the lip of the garage exiting the bottom left corner of the frame and the right pillar making the rightmost element of the rule of thirdsOn the right I couldn't add more without getting sky, diagonal lines and a new wall in the frame. I think the grass puts a little more attention on the car. The metal on the left edge is supposed to give support or a defined end. I kept the lines and the right half of the picture only because of threedimensionality, I considered leaving it out.
>Nothing catches the eyeWhich doesn't have to be bad for this kind.
>Leading lines take me out of the frame. What's the subject? What am I looking at?I found the partitioning exciting and the possibility to contrast a building with nature and to contrast light with shadow. See the attached crop. Maybe I'd like it better if there weren't any windows. On the other hand, they clearly tell the viewer that this is a house.
>framed off-centerYes, minor in my eyes.
