>>3973986found it:
>https://fstoppers.com/post-production/no-longer-need-photography-skills-be-good-photographer-588148Comments are gold as well:
>What a sad and depressing piece to run on a "photography" site. Just buy all these software products and make a few clicks. You're awesome. I don't know what the future of photography is, but it looks looks like the future of photography web sites is clickbait.>That rage against commercial photography that you started many posts ago, please address it to the writer. Let me post this again. "The final image I settled on for use in this article is below. To reiterate, I wanted two main things from this shot: to show enough of the unbroken wave behind the surfer to suggest riding the wave that way was also possible and to show the surfer wearing the new vest from this wetsuit company’s catalog.">I know it’s clickbait, but the whole essence of the article clearly illustrates that the author has no understanding of what photography actually is. The idea that it revolves around pointing a device at a scene or subject and snapping away is what photography is not, though it’s a good description of what a snapper is. Snapping and photography are two fundamentally different things and not to be confused. To say the article is born of ignorance I would say is a fair assessment. 