>>3975394You're right - the X-T20 is a technically superior camera on paper, and if you care about video more than a normal hobbyist, or if you see yourself doing anything with photography that would benefit from more megapixels, pick the X-T20.
Ergonomically, the X-Pro1 may have a more preferable body style, and I subjectively feel that it makes me want to go out and take pictures more. It's relatively discrete despite not really being that small, and the lack of a camera bump has an undeniable effect on your own self-perception of conspicuousness, whether one realizes it or not.
I'm not one of those aforementioned X-Pro1 cultists who believe that there's some film-like magic in the X-Trans I sensor, but I do think that the 16 MP is plenty fine, and handles ISO in a very pleasant way up to 3200.
I say all of this as someone who used the X-Pro1 for about seven years, and who has recently moved on to the X-Pro2 in July due to video interests.
