>>4311290>Are more compactFuji next to zf, lumix gx* next to a7c, the cameras are the same size give or take 0.1 pounds
>>4311309 Let me remind you that you are bitching about the dumbest shit on earth by using GRAMS (a non-unit invented to increase the psychological impact of small differences - we use pounds and kg here) and comparing an f8 zoom to an f4 zoom. In fact, you are comparing a 24-90 f8 to a 24-105 f4. Actually fucking retarded.
This is absolutely retarded because nobody on full frame would willingly use an f8 zoom knowing exactly how shitty their photos would come out. Diffraction smears after stopping down once, high ISO all the time, ouch. I have seen the photos from such setups. I have used such setups. Like the difference between FF and non-fuji APSC ie: canon R7 is small if you put equally good glass on each, essentially down to 50% changes in sharpness and noise, - the difference between m43 and an android phones camera is even smaller ESPECIALLY when you put a 24-90 f8 on it.
Put comparable lenses on and the difference is astoundingly small. Who would use an f8 zoom anyways? Phone tier images.
>inb4 this must surely be bokeh1: You would embrace and enjoy bokeh as an option if you were not coping with your stupid purchases
2: l2hyperfocal, if you cant shoot a landscape at f4 you literally do not know how to use a camera
3: diffraction after stopping down once lmao
>omg "62 grams" (in real units: 0.062kg or 0.13lb)>i am going to dieThen it gets funnier. Compare primes and the m43 is slower, softer, bigger, and "heavier" (in grams)
Olympus sold the camera division for a reason. Panasonic abandoned m43 except for a FF sized camcorder for a reason. The market segment these used to compete in was replaced by smartphones. All they have now is gimmicks that real photographers don't care about like FPS and bird detect AF. You know most significant bird photos were shot on a 5fps DSLR right?
