>>4179936>it ceases to be street photographySays who? As a random street shooter, If I take a street photo of Hitler rising from the dead on a side walk, is it now just too good to be "street photography"? By definition, snapping Hitler randomly rising from the dead on a public sidewalk, would still be "street photography". Or are street photography supposed to be limited in what they can capture. I'd also argue that all street gives the viewer freedom to decide the meaning, with how street can include fine art, abstract or surreal.