>>4372738>ultra minimal setupyup
learning to see the universe cut into the fov of your active lens is a gift. It's easy to get stuck on one fov though, if its well onside the really wide or really long range its good for as more specific thing than if the lens isnt really long or wide. Moreso if its a zoom, thats not really long nor wide.
I have a 28-200mm, f/5ish iirc) that I would love to get in a constant f/2.8 lens. But apparently physics says thats too much to ask for. 70-200mm is pretty good. I used to hate that range when i was shooting film at 16, 28, 50 and 600mm in the 80/90s, but preferences change along with the subject and technology.
>tasteful boudior.The two or three guys I know/knew who did that I havent heard of for years, because i dont see them around any more, but iirc most were married, and I always imagined that was going to be a disaster for them.
They always seemed to be a little too enthusiastic about it, as well as being protective of their whole thing.
Each to their own, but the whole concept of 'tasteful boudoir.' makes me feel a bit repulsed. Also dangerous in numerous ways.
I'm followed by some exceptionally attractive females on social media, but it's probably not something I'd ever agree to shoot. I'm not pretty enough.
