>>2707095> That is pretty impressive AF on the mark iii though.Yes, it's much, much better. Definitely workable for me.
> And I just think for the price gap and considering I don't use AF all that much means I'd be better off spending €800 on the mark ii and the rest of a 24mm lens and a holidayProbably so. I'd personally however jump to the A6000 (450€, pic related is AF coverage on the A6000) + dumb or smart adapter with FR (~80 or 400€).
Gets me much better AF with native lenses when I need it, and okay AF with the supported Canon lenses that is at least not center-only.
Plus focus peaking and MF assist magnifier functionality on the EVF, not just the back panel. (With Magic Lantern, you can still get these two functions at least on your 5D II's back panel, though.)
Also all of this, specs wise:
http://snapsort.com/compare/Canon_EOS_5D_Mark_II-vs-Sony-Alpha-A6000/detailedBut if you're not feeling like it, the 5D II will be fine - again, I'm most strongly bothered by it's AF.
