>>3536330This is the dumbest shit. Exposure isn't that complicated, the guy will go on and on about esoteric shit that you should take into account when setting exposure, when it's just as simple as making a judgement about what you're willing to overexpose/underexpose in your image based on the kind of film you have. You'd have to have the IQ of a bonobo's foreskin to think that you should spend $200 on something that you can figure out through trial and error, instead of putting it into film and a nice weekend out.
Outside of that, read a book from one of the greats I guess.
