>>3196655if I have a flash for the macro would handholding be fine? as a test, I used my flash on my current carry around lens, I put my aperture up to f/22, shutter speed of 250, and iso 100. in a room with no lights, and it was still well lit.
>>3196659for my macros, before I got the D750 I used the rx100 with some close-up filters, and with editing, I was able to come up with stuff like this. just by looking at pictures I am assuming that it would be much better in quality, and would you rank the sharpness near, above, or below your standard lenses that are not macro? if they are above I would probably not notice or be disappointed too much
>>3196663I don't often do animals so I wouldn't be sad about missing some shots on them I would just have to take more shot and learn how to utilize my gear and try to find opportunities, but mostly I will be shooting still stuff like pic related.