>>3993257You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
>>3993259>I already gave you the correct time stamps of it missing focus.And I already gave you the timestamp of the reviewer saying it (A7R3) wouldn't focus. Which is apparent from the fact that it never got close to being in focus. Not even at 3:30.
>>the lens motor just stops working>No, but it can overshoot when the body expected it to behave differently.No it cannot. You literally have zero fucking clue how any of this works. The body is never confused about where the focusing group is.
>A motor in lens couldn't work if it didn't have breaks. HOLY FUCKING SHIT HE ACTUALLY BELIEVES THERE ARE BRAKES!!! Do you need to change the brake pads on these lens brakes???
>Secondly, if it isn't calibrated right then yes the AF will failure.On a mirrorless? Which was working perfectly in daylight? That's your cope now?
>Why do you think they issue firmware fixes for lenses, retard?To work around bugs in Sony's open mount.
>>Are you actually claiming that Canon STM lenses won't work on a 1DX?>Not as good as USM motors. STM is better for video.
