>>3281142Creep shots are a very valid subject. I would love to go full Gary Winogrand, but in these litigious times, creep shots are much safer. A full candid shot of a woman is beautiful, contextual, but it comes with the risk of the candid subject taking civil action against the photographer. A "creep shot" is much more discreet while also being more objectifying as it's sole focus is on the shape and form of the woman while deindividualizing her. She is literally a sex object regardless, that's just biology, but the image of the creep shot dispells all false notions otherwise.
