>>3762830Why is that thing so goddamn fuckhuge? I mean it really doesn't have to be to support 70mm f/2. That's an entrace pupil of 3.5cm so theoretically it doesn't need to be much bigger than that. I know it's enormous to help image quality and corrections and shit but why did they go so far in the direction of "optical perfection + hugeness"? Maybe because it's the first of its kind and they wanted to show what was possible.
