>>4167511Not Ambush, funny to see you switch from claiming I was Tom though. When will you start charging Ambush for the occupied headspace? I surely hope the catalogs were at least free of charge.
If instead of saying I'm Ambush or Tom (or the many others you accused me of being) you said I'm the guy who absolutely wrecked you on the eye resolution argument and exposed your gross misunderstanding of Roger N. Clark's work, you'd be correct. But no, you insist on trying to pin my identity to someone else.
