>>4383229>And I'm not saying that the colors are POS. I'm saying that era of sony renders colors in such a way in lightroom, that it is hard to get the skin tones to look natural. They lean green, even when you fix the white balance. Reason is unknown to me. For what I've heard, it's not a thing anymore in the more recent cameras.Nailed it. I've processed RAWs from all the major brands except Panasonic. It's not all the time. But there are times when Sony and Nikon leave you with a stubborn green or blue cast that's hard to get rid of. No idea why, and a simple color temp adjustment or color balance change either doesn't completely eliminate it, or screws up colors in another way. It's worse in video because even 10-bit log isn't as flexible as 14-bit stills RAW.
I can't say it's so horrible or consistent that one should just avoid either. But it was definitely a reason for me to stick with Canon all the way back when I was tempted by the A7Rs. And the reason why a friend with a boatload of pro Nikon cameras and lenses (shit like the D850, Z7ii, 500mm f/4) ends up shooting his Fuji cameras a lot of the time.
>but muh blind test!Useless because you're not testing for the problem. When there's not a problem RAWs from any brand are in your hands. You can decide the look and color that you want. Preferring one over the other is retarded because you can produce any final product that you want. The couple of tests setup (i.e. Northrups) just didn't happen to be in lighting conditions where the problem was evident. But people absolutely do run into it.
