>>4204983I mean if you're so fucking adamant about making stupid, irrelevant comparisons you might as well throw the D850 and 5Ds into the mix.
I thought you were doing the resize in
>>4204972 but now I realize it's not that the feather moved, it's that it's cropped tighter.
>>4204988Yeah it says here you're a fag and your shit's all retarded. Here you go, ISO compensated for noise and all. K-1 and D850 still come on top.
It's not about fanboying anything. It's about helping anon pick the best choice for his budget. The K-1 happens to be a great camera you can get for like 800 bucks with just a couple thousand shots, in a different market maybe it wouldn't make as much sense. You may hate it, but it's what peak performance for the dollar looks like.
If I held autistic grudges like you do and lacked common sense like you I'd just tell anon to get a 4x5 field camera and spend the rest on Portra 800 sheets, that kind of quality can't be beat. But I'm providing useful advice instead. And if anon's nature photography includes wildlife, I'd say go with 20+ MP MFT or 90D instead. He said landscape. For landscape under 1000 bucks the K-1 can't be beat right now. D850 and 5Ds are superior but also above budget. For basic use the 90D is almost as good but the lack of pixel shift makes it fall far behind for landscape.
