>>2635248Ok
>>2635239>>2635233Yeah I know the long exposures are weaker in other pics, I think the 1 you used as an example is the strongest case FOR the long exposure.
>>2635225I was going for a creepy vibe on the church, so i wanted it partially covered...
The Vik beach shot is crap and i know it.
The iceberg shot was actually really tricky due to no direct sunlight anywhere but the glacier in the back. PLUS the ash that made it's way into the icebergs meant very strong local contrast with overcast lighting. If the dust storm hadn't rolled in off the sandar I would have liked to spend more time there.
